Movie Review
Name of Movie: Earth 2100
Describe/list/ outline the main themes of the
movie. (50 words)
The
movie is a kind of prediction about our human life and their relation with the
world if we continuous our pace of life. In the film, principally, expound the irresponsibility
of human in the use of no-renewable source like oil and the consequences if the
leader of the world not-congregate their willpower change the world.
Personally, I think that the movie is
not good, in fact, I bored a lot seeing it. I believe it, because the movie for
me is like an attempt of exultation of all natural sins that United Estate has committed
in the world. The experts that appear in the film seems forget the intention of
Unite Estate for control oil reserves in Mexico, Venezuela, Iraq, so when in the
film arise the scene in
that China and India no want to reduce his emission, I think that director want
to we believe: “Why, why… if E.E.U.U. only want to save us, it is a good
country”. Another think that don’t like about the movie is the stigmatize with
the Sudamerican and centroamerican people, incapable of achieve agreement in
his country for do a new world, more sustainable, is like E.E.U.U. was our dad,
who teach us how we have to do the things. Not that I do not agree with
renewable energy and with turn this world in one more sustainable, I just say
that don’t like the role that takes E.E.U.U in this game.
List a minimum of three
facts, pieces of important information or “other” from the video that you would
like to remember and would want to tell a friend about.
1. I think that was interesting the idea of cover
the earth with a gas that can help to the global warming, I don’t understood how
can be possible.
3. In the movie, appear a lot the use
of clean energy, and that is good, because the people that will see it, will
know the alternative to oil and will think that a new world is possible
Carlos,
ResponderBorrarWC: 334. A Little bit too many.
I understand your point in your review, which is very interesting, but you need to work on the construction of the ideas. Make sure you use the correct name of the country you criticise: The USA, or United States. Some expressions are not used correctly, like "expound" or " if the leaders DO not congregate...(?)...
You have a point of view, make sure you explain it correctly.
Cheers,
JC